Cornerstone guide · KeHE operations

KeHE deduction management: the complete operating guide

For CPG operations teams managing KeHE deductions — from first remittance review through dispute resolution and prevention.

The repeatable process of connecting a deduction to its purchase order, cause, evidence, decision, and outcome, then using what happened to reduce preventable recurrence.

The operating loop

From remittance to root cause in six controlled steps.

STEP 01

Find the deduction

Start with the remittance or K-Solve export. Preserve the original line, amount, date, code, and available reference fields. KeHE uses 111 distinct prefix codes, each representing a different billing mechanism.

STEP 02

Connect the PO

Match the line to the retailer-issued purchase order, shipment, invoice, and receiving event. Unmatched items stay in investigation until the connection is established.

STEP 03

Classify the cause

Separate contractual passthroughs from deductions that may be disputable. Do not treat every deduction as recoverable. In one verified audit, 88% of deduction dollars were contractual passthrough.

STEP 04

Assemble evidence

Collect the BOL, POD, packing list, ASN timing, appointment records, photos, emails, and applicable rule context. Evidence must be specific to the PO and deduction, not a general company document.

STEP 05

Choose the action

Verify, dispute, request documentation, escalate, or accept. Record the reason and owner for the next step. Disputes must be filed within 180 days through K-Solve.

STEP 06

Close the loop

Track the outcome and feed recurring causes back into routing, documentation, and fulfillment work. This is where deduction management becomes deduction prevention.

What you will actually see

Four deduction types that show up in every audit.

Each line below shows a real KeHE prefix code, what it means, and what it tells you about the next step. These four codes alone account for the majority of deduction activity in a typical K-Solve export.

SLFPotentially disputable

Service Level Fine

Fill rate dropped below 95% — KeHE assesses 3% of the shortage

If your 3PL pick confirmation and BOL show full quantity, the DC miscount is your evidence. One verified dispute was worth $9,300.

IAInvestigate

Invoice Adjustment

KeHE adjusts the invoice to match what they say was received

IA has four sub-types: product short, missed allowance, supplier return, and price discrepancy. Read the K-Solve backup PDF section headers before classifying.

MCBCheck AAP status

MCB Processing Fee

8% of the promotional allowance, $130/month minimum per DC

If you are enrolled in AAP (Administrative Allowance Program), the MCB processing fee is waived. Check enrollment before disputing.

CSVerify the rate

Customer Spoilage Allowance

A proactive deposit taken automatically on every PO

CS is not event-driven — it is a fixed-rate allowance applied before any spoilage occurs. Verify the rate matches your P&P Terms Form. If it does, it is contractual.

KeHE uses 111 prefix codes total. See all 111 codes in the KeHE Library →

Worked example

One deduction through the full operating loop.

A $514.80 SLF (Service Level Fine) posts on PO-88214. Here is how it moves through the six steps.

1

Find

The K-Solve export shows SLF, $514.80, dated June 15, referencing PO-88214.

2

Connect

PO-88214 was a 200-case order to DC 41 Chino. Invoice was $17,160. Ship window was June 10-12.

3

Classify

SLF = 3% of shortage. KeHE says fill rate was 92% — they received 184 cases, not 200. That is a 16-case short at $32.17/case = $514.80. The math checks out. But is it actually short?

4

Evidence

3PL pick confirmation: 200 cases pulled. BOL signed by carrier: 200 cases loaded. POD signed at DC: 200 cases delivered. Email from DC receiving mentions "pallet was pinwheeled — recount required."

5

Decide

Disputable. KeHE's own carrier handoff records show 200 cases. The DC recount produced the shortage, not the shipment. File through K-Solve with the BOL, pick confirmation, and POD attached.

6

Close

Dispute filed June 22 (7 days after posting, well within 180-day window). Root cause: DC 41 Chino has produced 3 similar recounts this quarter. Escalate the pattern to the Supplier Manager.

Evidence chain

Build the case around the PO, not inside another folder.

Five categories of evidence connect a deduction to its operational context. Each must be specific to the PO and deduction date.

01Order

PO number, order date, ship window, requested delivery date, item and quantity detail

02Shipment

BOL, carrier events, appointment history, POD, pallet or case documentation

03Transaction

Invoice, remittance advice, K-Solve line, deduction code, allowance terms

04Communication

Buyer, broker, 3PL, warehouse, carrier, and KeHE correspondence

05Rule context

Current supplier policy, routing guide, fee schedule, or written agreement

Decision discipline

Three states. Three different next actions.

01

Contractual

The amount follows an agreed term or documented passthrough.

Verify the calculation, retain the record, and avoid spending dispute capacity without contrary evidence. In a verified audit, $140,914 of $151,671 fell into this category.

02

Disputable

The charge appears inconsistent with the PO, shipment record, agreement, or applicable rule.

Package the strongest evidence and file through K-Solve within the 180-day deadline. One verified dispute was worth $9,300 recoverable with proper documentation.

03

Unknown

The line cannot yet be tied to enough context to make a defensible decision.

Request documentation, resolve the PO match, or escalate. Do not guess. The system correctly identifies what it does not know, with FLAG recall improved from 29% to 100%.

Frequently asked

Should every KeHE deduction be disputed?+

No. A sound process distinguishes contractual passthroughs, potentially disputable items, and cases that still lack enough information. In the Sky & Sol audit, $140,914 (88%) was contractual passthrough. Disputing those wastes time and erodes credibility.

How many deduction codes does KeHE use?+

KeHE uses 111 distinct prefix deduction codes. Each represents a different billing mechanism. No public documentation exists for many of them. EasyOps has validated classification rules for 48 of these codes at 100% accuracy.

What should be preserved before a dispute?+

Preserve the original deduction line and connect it to the PO, invoice, remittance, shipment records, communications, and applicable rule context. KeHE expects a real evidence package, not a generic complaint.

Where does K-Solve fit?+

K-Solve is KeHE's supplier-facing deduction and dispute surface. It shows deduction data and is the only accepted channel for filing disputes. It does not replace the operational evidence held across EDI, email, the 3PL, carrier records, and internal decisions.

How does prevention connect to recovery?+

The same evidence used to investigate a deduction can reveal repeatable breakdowns in timing, documentation, routing, or coordination. For example, recurring shortages at a specific DC may indicate a labeling or packing issue that can be fixed upstream. Those causes should feed operating changes.

What is the dispute deadline?+

Disputes must be filed within 180 days of the deduction date. KeHE stopped accepting dispute submissions by email. The K-Solve portal is the only accepted channel.

Evidence boundary: This guide is an operating framework, not a substitute for current KeHE documents or a determination that any specific deduction is recoverable. Always verify current terms, evidence, and deadlines.